×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Would it be better to define the pri display as 132 in DSPSIZ. All the 80 screens can be DSPMOD(*DS3) at the record level and since it fits within 80 pos, no field level conditioning is required.
The records using 80+ positions would fall under the PRI specified by DSPSIZ and still require no conditioning.
Buddy.McClean@xxxxxxxxxxxx 9/3/2009 5:05:55 PM >>>
Thanks,
Ok, got that. Pri and sec are not effected by DSPMOD. I have to define everything with a secondary condition if it exists outside 24x80 (pri).
shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 9/3/2009 4:04:29 PM >>>
On 04/09/2009, at 6:33 AM, Buddy McClean wrote:
Obviously there are rules I'm not aware of.
Read the second-level text for message CPD7445. The last sentence in
the 'Cause' tells you exactly what is causing the issue with this line:
A *DS3 1 50
CPD7445: Condition name not valid secondary display size.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
