Re: Pointer vs. BIF performance (was: Getting into pointers) -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Pointer vs. BIF performance (was: Getting into pointers)
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:47:07 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Lim Hock-Chai wrote:

Note: You might want to replace the way that you get the for loop limit
from %len(%trim(SRCDATA)) to %len(%trimr(SRCDATA)) (may also need to do
a subtract 1 for the pointer version) :).

Yeah, caught that already.

Thanks for the ideas guys.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Pointer vs. BIF performance (was: Getting into pointers) , Rory Hewitt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.