dale janus wrote:
Hmmm, why not use CHGPF?

Because old habits die hard?

Because the first time I tried CHGPF I got a warning message that scared me that I could lose data?

Does CPYF with (*MAP *DROP) not give a similar message? It should; I haven't actually looked. I'd expect mostly the same kinds of 'loss of data' to be possible both ways. Maybe the warning is a _good_ thing, eh?

Of course, CPFY with *NOCHK should be an obvious 'loss leader'. That should almost require additional programming to force the function to continue after acknowledging the condition.

Tom Liotta


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.