× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Eric has a good point, I considered making it myself...but decided not too
as that was a whole other can of worms...

However, since Eric brought it up :)

As Eric said, AcquireClientsWifesSistersDogsName() is a bit narrow to be in
service program.

However, the problem with dog_acquireNameByRelation( aRelative ) is that now
the DOG has to understand relations. I'd propose something along the lines
of

if client_isMale(client) and client_isMarried(client);
spouse = client_getSpouse(client);
if person_hasSister(spouse);
sister = person_getSister(spouse);
if dog_forOwnerExists(sister);
dog = dog_getByOwner(sister);
clientsWifesSistersDogsName = dog_getName(dog);
endif;
endif;
endif;

Now the above is pretty simplified, consider how to handle more than one
dog, more than one sister, ect...
Add in the code for that and things get pretty complex :)

That being the case, assuming you really need it, having a
GetClientWifesSistersDogsName() isn't a bad idea and if you need to call it
from more than one place then placing it into a service program _is_ a good
idea.

However, you wouldn't want it in the DOG, CLIENT, or PERSON modules; those
are low level probably corresponding to actual entities (tables) in your
application. Instead you'd want it in a module a step above those, call it
FAMILY (since I can't think of anything better.) FAMILY will make use of
the lower level modules and contain the complex (business) logic that
encapsulates the processes and rules for your application. So you might
have

FAMILY_getDogsNameForRelation(client:WIFE:SISTER);

You could, through the use of binder source, make the procedures in DOG and
PERSON protected, and only available within the service program that
contains them. Thus your UI and batch programs would never directly access
DOG_getName(). Though you might make visible a FAMILY_getDogsName()


As another example I've used before, lets say you have an INVENTORY service
program made up of the following modules:
INVENTORY - The publicly accessable procedures
INVMAST - protected I/O Procedures for the Inventory Master file
INVTRANS - protected I/O Procedures for the Inventory Transaction History
file

You UI or batch applications may call INVENTORY_Receive(), which in turn
would call INVMAST_Receipt() and INVTRANS_LogReceipt() for instance.

HTH,
Charles Wilt


On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:30 AM, DeLong, Eric <EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

David,

I understand your point, but I might counter with another. To me, a
procedure as described below (wifesSistersDog) is too narrow to be included
in a service module. One could presume that there are also procedures for
WifesBrothersDog, WifesMothersDog, WifesFathersDog, and so on.... As a
whole, having dozens of clones of a procedure to support a series of related
test cases could be simplified with a better design. Perhaps you only need
dog_acquireNameByRelation( aRelative ), then within your code, you can
support any number of associations.

A rule of thumb, if you can't describe the effects of a procedure
efficiently, then perhaps the design should be reviewed.

Jmo,
-Eric DeLong



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.