× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. May 2009

Re: Sub procedure end specification

I agree...I've gotten into that habit myself.

Also, when defining constants, I do the same thing.

Charles

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RNewton@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
By using the line extender "..." it
allows us to easily use this as a template so we can do find and replace
for the proc name without adjusting the position of everything after it.

This is the best use of the extender I've seen to date.

A big +1 to this technique.  If you're going to go verbose, this is
definitely the way to go.

Joe
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.