× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Did you see my earlier email?

Here's the essentials...

INFDS (somewhere around pos 401) has the key to the next record. How much
more "look ahead" can you get?


In a message dated 4/26/2009 7:37:45 P.M. Jerusalem Daylight Time,
mlazarus@xxxxxxxx writes:

Barbara,

Along the same lines, is there any reason that limits file
processing hasn't been expanded to use externally described file fields?

-mark


At 4/24/09 01:54 PM, you wrote:
Douglas Handy wrote:

Well, couldn't that just have been handled the same way you rename a
field
from an external format, even under RPG III?

In my experience with look-ahead fields in the 70's, you typically only
cared about a few fields at most and only list them under the **
I-spec, not
the whole record format. Why couldn't the field rename columns be
used to
supply the new name?
>

That's a good point.

I can't guess at any other possible reasons for disallowing it. It's
possible that "they" had the same thinking as I just did.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.