× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.








Manual say 8 to 80. I don't believe they can ever extend it because of
the original developers decision to have 8 to 80 as source and
anything beyond the 80 character as comment.
While i agree with you statement, i remeber that Back in RPGIII days,
column width was 80 and comments started before, so there was *lesser*
spaces. However, IBM came out with larger source aind increase column width
just changing the SRC Type and make you convert throung CVTRPGSRC.

I don't see any particulary issue creating a new RPGFREE (or something
like) type nad allowing for longer row and not need for comments in last
pos. Even me can wrote a conversion program between current format and new
format allowing past-80 text became a comment (uh-uh, just add //
before....(

While i don't like istruction that goes beyond the screen (especially since
they're nowadays much larger than in the past) i found 80 col limitation
very ugly. especially for WDSC user (which is what all of us is supposed to
move to...) Having a 19" video and use for 1/4 of is width is insane


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.