× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Hi All,

I am updating a service program (TXTUTILS) that includes several modules (I am actually adding a couple more modules). There currently is a binding directory (TXTUTILS) that has only one entry, which is the service program (TXTUTILS). There are many RPG programs that reference the binding directory within the H specs in order to use the subprocedures. I am also using binder language to handle the signatures. Since we use a CMS application to move the code from DEV, QA and PROD, I am getting tired of entering each module in the CRTSRVPGM command.

My question is this: Would it be considered best practice to create another binding directory that contains all the modules that make up the service program and reference that on the CRTSRVPGM command or am I adding another level of complexity that really does not add value? The goal would be to minimize and simplify the promotion process through the change management application.

Thank you in advance for your input.

Jim Minisce
Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.