RE: OPM called by program running in a named activation group

-----Message d'origine-----
De : rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de
J.Beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Envoyé : jeudi 26 mars 2009 14:04
À : RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Objet : RE: OPM called by program running in a named activation group

David,

When IBM started with ILE we were told that ACTGRP(*NEW)
should be avoided, because of the overhead it used.

I just changed a 'work with' program. It used to start with
an empty screen (subfile), but lazy users thought it too much
work that they had to start with page down. So now I start
with loading all appropriate records (with a maximum of 1200)
into the subfile. It also uses ACTGRP(*NEW). When I start it
from the menu, I press <enter>, blink my eye and it is there
(500 records).

I don't worry about ACTGRP(*NEW) for these kind of programs.

Joep




From:
David FOXWELL <David.FOXWELL@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
26-03-2009 13:40
Subject:
RE: OPM called by program running in a named activation group



I'm suprised by that, Joep. It wasn't even considered. When I
get to installing in our pre-production environment, it will
be interesting to recompile my program with *NEW and see what happens.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de
J.Beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Envoyé : jeudi 26 mars 2009 09:49
À : RPG programming on the IBM i / System i Objet : RE: OPM

called by

program running in a named activation group

rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 26-03-2009 09:36:42:

We have disregarded *NEW, because that will mean reopening

the files

for each choice the user makes from the subfile.

David,

What is the problem with reopening files? Performance? If

so, have you

actually tried it? Keeping files open for performance reasons might
have had its use in the days of the
S/38 and possibly early AS/400's, but these days it is more trouble
than it's worth.

Joep Beckeringh
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
(RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email:
RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting,

please take a

moment to review the archives at

http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
(RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email:
RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change
list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
(RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email:
RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change
list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.