×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Hi, Mike:
What that indicates, to me, is...
Perhaps instead of having two service programs, you should combine all
of the *MODULEs comprising these two *SRVPGMs into just one new service
program... That way, those references to each other will all be
"internal" and will be resolved automatically, whenever you re-create
the new *SRVPGM. Of course ,you can still have all the same procedures
that are "external" and can be called from other *PGMs.
This eliminates overhead for the system because, currently, whenever one
of your applications activates one of these service programs, since that
service program refers to another service program, that other service
program must also be activated. By combining them into one service
program, you reduce this overhead.
Does that "make sense" to you?
Mark S. Waterbury
> Mike wrote:
I have two service programs where each one references the other. Not
realizing that this problem would come up, I deleted all of the *SRVPGMs in
my library to recompile them all. Now I can't compile (CRTSRVPGM) either
service programs because "Definition not found for symbol 'XXXXXX'."
Is there a way to bypass this?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
