|
David Gibbs wrote:
I'm not sure that's correct ... if the RPG procedure has
extproc(*cl:name) defined, I *THINK* that should allow the procedure
to be called from both RPG and CL, but it will use CL return
parameter mechanism.
OK, to revisit this topic again briefly.
Can anyone think of a downside to adding the extproc(*cl:name) modifier to all prototypes that return a boolean (other than having to recompile all the callers)?
david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.