Scott Klement wrote:
So what's the solution? I can think of two:

a) The best solution is to modernize [SNIP]

b) Since a MODS is stored in consecutive memory, you can use pointers

Here are (untested) examples of the two options I described in my previous e-mail

====== OPTION A: USE DS ARRAYS ======

Copy book for EDTCSTRTN:

D EdtCstRtn_Subparm_t
D e ds extname(EDTCSTPF)
D qualified
D EdtCstRtn_Plist1_t
D e ds extname(EDTCSTHDR)
D qualified

DEdtCstRtn PR ExtPgm('@EDTCSTRTN')
D SubParm likeds(EdtCstRtn_Subparm_t)
D dim(500)
D SubParm1 Likeds(EdtCstRtn_Plist1_t)

In the caller program... make sure to /COPY copybook, and
then code:

Dmystruct ds likeds(EdtCstRtn_Subparm_t)
D dim(500)
DStruct1 e ds ExtName(EDTCSTHDR)

instead of OCCUR or %OCCUR, reference mystruct as
an array. For example:

mystruct(x).field1 = value;
mystruct(x).field2 = value2;
... etc ...

Callp EdtCstRtn(MyStruct:Struct1);

In the called program, do this:

DEdtCstRtn PI
D PlistPI likeds(EdtCstRtn_Subparm_t)
D dim(500)
D PlistPI1 Likeds(EdtCstRtn_Plist1_t)

and reference the data as:


and reference the 2nd parm as:


Note that the layout of the DS is defined in only one place -- the copy book. Since you /COPY the same thing in both places, you get the precise same definition each time... and that's a very good thing, it protects you against errors.


DEdtCstRtn PR ExtPgm('@EDTCSTRTN')
D SubParm Like(MyStruct)
D SubParm1 Like(Struct1)

Dmystruct e ds ExtName(EDTCSTPF)
D occurs(500)
DStruct1 e ds ExtName(EDTCSTHDR)

I fill the structure and then call the second program

%occur(myStruct) = 1;
Callp EdtCstRtn(MyStruct:Struct1);

Here is the code from the Called program:

DCstRtnParm PR ExtPgm('@EDTCSTRTN')
DPlistPR Like(PlistParm)
DPlist1PR Like(Plist1)
DCstRtnParm PI
DPlistPI Like(PlistParm)
DPlist1PI Like(Plist1)

DPlistParm e ds ExtName(EDTCSTPF)
D occurs(500)
D based(p_PlistParm)
DPlist1 e ds ExtName(EDTCSTHDR)
D based(p_Plist1)

p_PlistParm = %addr(PlistPI);
p_Plist1 = %addr(Plist1PI);

... do NOT EVAL one to the other...
... simply access PlistParm as a normal MODS.

Note that MyStruct and PlistPArm *must* have an identical definition for this to work properly, and you MUST pass the first occurrence to the called program, or unpredictable results will occur. The basing pointers only force the two copies of the DS to overlay the same block of bytes in the computers memory. If they don't match, you might end up reading data that belongs to other variables, or you might end up getting corrupt data, etc.

Anyone who makes changes to your program will need to understand the mechanism and how to ensure that the definitions are always the same, or they'll have unpredictable results, too. Unlike option (A), the compiler won't provide any safeguards.

Method (b) also precludes the use of CONST, and therefore makes it harder to provide good encapsulation. (Though, I don't know if this is an input/output parameter or input only, though.)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.