|
From the fact I have not had much feedback I can only deduce whatI said is true. Your point about an expensive NON-AS400 solution
date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:28:51 -0600
from: Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Frank
Figured you knew that stuff, just threw it out just in case.
One expensive solution is IBM federation support - I think it's part of
their Information Integrator or Data Integrator or whatever - makes
several remote databases all look like one DB2 instance on a PC.
I do forget - is there any point to maybe bringing a chunk of data to
the program, store it somewhere, change connections, get some more,
store again, process? Again, ugly!
Later
Vern
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.