Re: Supported Syntax in SQLRPGLE in V6R1. Changed?

I change the command defaults so I don't even have to remember anything (except to change the defaults on a new release!)

I just got this from Common:

COMMON Webcast - What's New in RPG for V6R1

So I guess I'll check it out to find out why my SQLRPGLE programs from V5R3M0 no longer compile in V6R1M0 (Barbara Morris should know if anyone does!)

Pete


Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

the SET OPTION is not mandatory...but is much better than trying to remember and manually key them in on the compile options 8^)

Thanks,
Tommy Holden



From:
Pete Helgren <Pete@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
12/05/2008 10:10 AM
Subject:
Re: Supported Syntax in SQLRPGLE in V6R1. Changed?
Sent by:
rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Even if none were ever used before? That is, is the Set Option now a required entry in an SQLRPGLE program? I usually set the options at compile time.

Pete


Helge Bichel wrote:

The SQL Set Option has to appear first in the source when on V5R4.

exec Sql Set Option Commit = *NONE, CloSQLCsr = *ENDMOD;
Brgds
Helge


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [

mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vern Hamberg

Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:38 AM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Subject: Re: Supported Syntax in SQLRPGLE in V6R1. Changed?

Pete

There is something about stuff that has to appear first in source now - might have started in V5R4 - I hope this tickles someone's memory. But it is like DECLARE CURSOR and such need to be at the top of the source.

I dunno!

Vern

Pete Helgren wrote:

Well, I don't get it. Seems like there is something different about

the

way host variables are defined and used since V5R3M0. I went back to using the 270 I have at V5R3M0 so I could get this fix compiled and out

to the customer but it is awfully strange that an SQLRPGLE source

member

from a V5R3M0 box can't be pulled over and compiled in V6R1M0.

Once I get this out to the customer, I'll call IBM. Seems like it

would

be something simple but after searching all afternoon on the 'Net, I haven't found anything promising.

Pete


Brian Johnson wrote:

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Pete Helgren <Pete@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Brian.

Do you know if host variable use changed in 6.1?

Sorry, I'm not there yet, still working at V5R3. The work-around for

the

problem I'm thinking about was to use CRTSQLRPGI GENLVL(30) to accept

the

'error' and allow the compile to continue. Perhaps your command

default was

changed at V5R3 but hasn't been propagated to the V6 box.