Re: How do you sequence/order your subroutines/subprocedures?

[Adam Glauser <adamglauser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kurt Anderson wrote:
> I suppose my use of the word "difficult" was going too far.  It's simply
> easier for me to navigate via the outline than to do ctl-F (because the
> first, second, maybe even fifth search might not get me to where I want
> to go, and I could have already clicked on the outline to be where I
> want to be).

Aha!  Now I think I see the misunderstanding.  Because the outline view 
doesn't alphabetize procedures, it is more difficult to find them 
_within_the_outline_view_ if there are many procedures.  I agree that it 
seems strange that subroutines and prototypes are alphabetized, but 
procedures appear in the source order.

In that case, I have two suggestions.  If I want to use the Ctrl-F find 
function to go directly to a procedure definition, I search for 'P 
procedureName(' instead of 'procedureName'.  Should get you there in one go.

Using the outline view, you can click the 'Subprocedures' section, then 
just type the first view letters of the procedure name to position to 
that procedure.  This would also work a bit better if the list was 
alphabetized, but if you know the exact procedure name you want it 
should still work reasonably well.  However, if many of your procedures 
have a common prefix (such as MODULENAME_ for a module that is part of a 
SRVPGM), you need to be a pretty accurate typist. :)