×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Hi Barbara,
Say the first change to use service programs costs 100 upheaval points.
Choice A is: pay 100 + 1 upheaval points up front. Choice B is: pay
or 100 upheaval points initially, 10000 upset-user points due to
signature violations, then 200 more upheaval points.
I agree with you and Adam, it's better to use binder language from the
start.
However, I think you're overstating the difficulty of adding binder
language after the fact. It's not THAT difficult. Sure, you have to
use DSPSRVPGM to find out what the generated signature is, and what the
list of exports looks like, but once you've done that, you can create a
*PRV signature group that's compatible with the export(*all) version.
It's not THAT hard to do, and once you've done it, you can use binder
language to do things properly.
Seems to me that if changing to service programs is 100 upheaval points,
adding binder language after the fact can't be more than maybe 20
upheaval points. Sure, it's more painful than learning binder language
from the start, but not nearly as painful as the initial srvpgm transition!
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
