Re: RPG III program calls faster than RPG IV???? -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: RPG III program calls faster than RPG IV????
From: Scott Klement <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:51:39 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

OPM calling OPM is creating one call stack entry each time.
ILE calling ILE is creating two call stack entries each time. One for the PEP, one for the UEP.

So it seems reasonable to me that ILE calling ILE would take about twice as long.

Wilt, Charles wrote:

OPM calling OPM 6s 62s Dynamic Program Call 12s 122s
Bound Procedure 1s 4s

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: RPG III program calls faster than RPG IV???? , Wilt, Charles
RE: RPG III program calls faster than RPG IV???? , Wilt, Charles

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.