RE: MCH3402 - and Built-In-Function %OPEN

Brigitta,

I'm curious, why the requirement for RclActGrp?

Do you really need it? Can you remove that requirement?

If so, then you could use named AG without the client needing to change anything.

Charles Wilt
--
Software Engineer
CINTAS Corporation - IT 92B
513.701.1307

wiltc@xxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of BirgittaHauser
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 1:32 AM
To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: MCH3402 - and Built-In-Function %OPEN

Hi,

It's a shame, this isn't your own company. Then you may have another

option, leave the project, as incompatible based on the users
requirements,

... Not possible, it's a rather big project and there is too much money
that
is not yet paid. As far as I know we confirmed in our contract, that the
client do not have to change ANYTHING. That's why he is not willing to add
a
RCLACTGRP(MyActGrp) to his programs nor is he willing to execute routine
correctly and he insists on using RCLRSC to close the files.

At least we learned something for the next project: Adding a term to our
contract that we use ILE concepts with named activation groups and do not
change our concept.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Birgitta Hauser

This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be confidential and privileged. If you receive this e-mail and you are not a named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any attachments from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.