× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. July 2008

Re: XML* vs. eXpat

Michael,

Have you also looked at RPG-XML (from Aaron Bartell/KrengelTech). It's not
free, unlike the built-in XML* BIF's or Scott's eXpat port, but it's a
better, more flexible, solution, I think (certainly better than XML-INTO
etc., which are horrible and very limited). You can probably download a demo
version from their website.

Rory

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Michael Ryan <michaelrtr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Looking for some opinions here...I have a complex (to me) XML document
that I'll need to parse and extract the data. I've used Scott's port
of eXpat before, and that's worked well for me. Finally on V5R4, so I
thought about using the XML* opcodes. Any opinions on using one over
the other? Are there cases where one approach works better?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.