× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




I think the difference is that I see two consecutive statements (chain/read and if %found / %eof) as one atomic expression. If these are separated then it's best to qualify to avoid any ambiguaty. Point is, in most cases a chain/read is directly followed by %found/%eof.

Anyway... this is my last post on the subject; there much more important issues.


Subject: RE: Standards question: What is your feeling about %found & %eofvs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ?
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:30:44 +0100
From: Martin.Hillier@xxxxxxxxxx
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi John,

I always try to get a line of code to be self explanitory. %EOF doesnt do this - whereas %EOF(file) does

I just know some swine will enter another file read just before my %EOF test at some point in the future

Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
Sent: 03 July 2008 14:50
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: Standards question: What is your feeling about %found &
%eofvs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ?


john e wrote:
I always try to create readable (or "self documenting") code and always use %eof instead of %eof(name), because IMO this is much more readable. It is applying the priniciple of DRY (dont repeat yourself).



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.134 / Virus Database: 270.4.3/1528 - Release Date: 7/1/2008 7:26 AM

--------------------------------------------------------

This message (including any attachments) is only for the use of the person(s) for whom it is intended. It may contain Mattel confidential, proprietary and/or trade secret information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy, distribute or use this information for any purpose, and you should delete this message and inform the sender immediately.
--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.


_________________________________________________________________
Download Messenger op je mobiel!
http://www.windowslivemobile.msn.com/nl/

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.