× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. July 2008

Re: Standards question: What is your feeling about %found & %eofvs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ?

Paul wrote:

Has anyone had any real issues in not qualifying the bif with the file
name......other than cases where the I/O Opcode and the test were separated
by more than one statement number?

Nope.

I don't have a particularly strong feeling on the matter either way. I've always used the non-qualified form and liked it, but if I went to work at a place that insisted on the qualified form, I'd have no trouble changing styles to match.
--buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.