×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
No, not using a user space just a data structure. And yes I'm getting
the entire table. It's basically a copy file with some records omitted.
Using blocked fetches and inserts blows any other I/O method out of the
water. It even seems to be faster than an insert with a sub-select.
~Zach
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Campin
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:35 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Magic Number
<snip
I have a table with a row length of 1958 bytes. I'm fetching it to an
array that has 8566 elements defined as an external data structure over
that table.
</snip>
When you refer to an external data structure do you mean a user space?
One of my great irritations with IBM that we still do not have User
Spaces that are terabyte enabled.
Constantly running in the 16mb limit on User Spaces.
Just curious to why you would need to read in 1958 bytes of data. Do you
read in the entire table?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
