Re: Is RPG 'DEAD"

On top of the other comment about MONITOR being a semi-equivalent to
try/catch (try/catch is better because you can catch custom errors) I would
also point out that RPG has the same getter/setter capabilities, though they
aren't necessarily autogenerated for you based on global variables.

I am curious as to what you mean by memory leaks in RPG? I haven't ever
experienced these outside of programmer error, but maybe that is what you
are talking about.

And lastly, what are virtual functions?

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Steve Richter <stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:41 AM, David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Adam West wrote:

We have been searching for a new ERP package. In additon to looking
at RPG Iseries based, we hired a consultant to assist in this
endeavour. He has made a statement that RPG is Dead, that he claims,
IBM guys told him so.

I am interested in opinions and links to the contrary on this,

COBOL has been dead for years. Nobody told the COBOL programmers though.

COBOL is inferior to RPG because you cant modularize your code with
parameters on a perform statement. RPG is inferior to Java and C#
because of memory leaks, no try ... catch .... finally blocks, no
property setters and getters, no delegates, no data struct member
functions, no virtual functions, ....

RPG is OK, but C# and Java are more feature rich.
--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.