I believe COBOL/400 supports date fields about as well as RPG/400 -- both allow the user to have them converted to fixed length character fields. ILE COBOL, like ILE RPG, does support date, time, and timestamp fields.
Bruce
"John Arnold (MFS)" <jarnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Date format is not supported in COBOL400.
If you need to use a file in both RPG and COBOL apps, the decimal 8 is
necessary.
John Arnold
(301) 354-2939
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 2:54 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: To Date or Not to Date... that is the question
I go back and forth on this internally and decided to ask the experts.
Without starting another political battle (like that won't happen), when
defining a date field, is it better to define it as a date or as a
decimal 8?
What I see is:
Benefits to date:
* SQL selections on date are simple
* can easily use data BIFS
Benefits to decimal 8:
* Can have a "zero" date, a date typed field needs to be 0001-01-01
* date BIFS a bit harder to use (but not much)
What is your preference and why?
--
Mike Wills
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikewills
Blog -
http://mikewills.name
Podcasts -
http://podcastmike.com
--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
midrange.com
