× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. August 2007

Re: OVRMSGF and QCMDEXC procedure

You're way ahead of me then (as usual :-) ). For most things the QCMDEXC procedure works just fine and it seemed cleaner to let the procedure calculate the command length, but you're right -- it's not much and it avoids the occasional scoping problems.

Scott Klement wrote:
I learned this years ago -- and it's why I never wrap QCMDEXC into a subprocedure. Granted, it adds one more line of code to my program, but one line won't kill me.

Peter Dow (ML) wrote:
In this situation, the override is only in effect while control is in the QCMDEXC procedure. When control returned to the TESTADDR procedure, the override was gone. I guess I should of realized this since a procedure is another entry on the call stack.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.