× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Joe,

I've been reading this thread and I'd be interested in hearing where *you* think CC should be used. You say you've used it, but all of your posts are explaining why other peoples' scenarios are not justified in using CC. Please tell us why you used it and what your justification was (inquiring minds want to know :-) ).

*Peter Dow* /
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050
pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> /

Joe Pluta wrote:
From: Buck

Joe Pluta wrote:
Buck, you're missing my point again! That order that you rolled back
should
be posted with a timestamp that you fetched at the beginning the update,
and
then the order would have a timestamp prior to the update of the master
file.
That's the header, not the detail.

Okay, maybe I'm missing something. If you're updating an order, I can't see
that the update of one detail record is more than a few milliseconds after
the update of another, but that's me.


It just seems to me that you've unnecessarily convoluted this.
CC is easy to implement, easy to understand and just plain works.
That's my opinion, and the reader can take from that what they will. I
don't see a need to caution people away from CC, rather the opposite. I
felt that adding an actual developer's experience in a demanding
performance regime would be useful.

I agree more or less with all the above, but it is NOT free, and I don't
like recommending any technology unless it's necessary. That's just the way
I am, I guess <smile>.


I've been forced to look at my experience and reflect on whether it was
justified or my desire to tinker with something new. After reflecting
on it, I can say with honesty that I would solve the same problem with
commitment control today. That doesn't diminish your addition to the
thread one whit in my eyes. Thanks for your time and your thoughts.

And I'm certainly not implying that your decision was wrong. In fact, two
people can reasonably see the same situation and design different solutions.
I just wanted to make sure all sides of the discussion were addressed.

Joe



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.