Pete Helgren wrote on 19/07/2007 12:06:04:
Cool. WAY simpler than I expected. I stumbled over the two fields. I
read them as data structures but I can see how they are just fields.
The "like" made me think they WERE DS's.
Note that if the were DSes and LIKEDS instead, it would still be okay.
When LIKEDS is specified, QUALIFIED is implied. So the field names in the
like-defined DSes would actually be newData.field1, origData.field1, etc.
and so there would be no conflict. Even with qualified fields, you can
still reference the whole DS as one big ol' character field, like newData
<> origData or newData = fileNameDS.
HTH,
Adam
Attention:
The information contained in this message and or attachments is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from any system and destroy any copies. Thank you for your
time and consideration.
Attention:
Le contenu de ce message et(ou) les fichiers ci-joints s?adressent
exclusivement à la personne ou -entité à laquelle ils sont destinés. Ils peuvent
contenir de l?information confidentielle, protégée et(ou) classifiée. Il est
strictement interdit à toute personne ou entité autre que le(la) destinataire
prévu(e) de ce message d?examiner, de réviser, de retransmettre ou de diffuser
cette information, de prendre une quelconque action en fonction ou sur la base
de celle-ci, ou d?en faire tout autre usage. Si vous avez reçu ce message par
erreur, veuillez communiquer avec l?expéditeur(trice), supprimer ce message et
les fichiers ci-inclus de tout système, et en détruire toutes copies, qu?elles
soient électroniques ou imprimées. Nous vous remercions de votre entière
collaboration.
midrange.com
