×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




From: rob@xxxxxxxxx

As alluded, I am in the camp: "It's not a limitation - it's a feature!"

If you just HAVE to have multiple members, make it a partitioned table.
Granted there are those who might argue that they can save $0.75 worth of
disk space if they didn't have to add a field that would be only the
member name in a DDS file.

I won't argue the merits of your contention, Rob. However, I'm a big
advocate of DDL and I have to make sure that when somebody asks I can
explain all the downsides of my favored approach. This particular problem
makes it impossible to switch an existing multi-member physical from DDS to
DDL without fairly significant programming changes. (Remember, I'm from SSA
and I know all about multiple members, and am particularly aware of the
impact of redesigning database files to remove those members.)

Joe



This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.