|
Steve Richter wrote on 25/06/2007 13:33:26:
> and you trust all your programmers, consultants, managers - whomever
> is able to add a new procedure to a srvpgm - to always add new exports
> to the end of the binding source? There is no system support for
> enforcing this rule. Yet if it is not followed all your applications
> could crash when the revised srvpgm is promoted to production.
If they know enough to change the binder source, it shouldn't be too much
to ask to remember a simple rule like 'put new stuff at the end of the
exports list'. I can sympathize with your desire for some of the more
resource intensive language features you've mentioned in the past, but
complaining that binder language is too complicated? Give me a break!
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
