|
Crispin Bates wrote:
why not make the %len(myVaryFld:*MAX)
%len(myVaryFld:*DATA)
Because when I see %Len(xx:*DATA) it says to me "I want the length of the data", which we can already get with the ordinary %len() BIF. What I really want isn't the length of the data, it's the maximum length that will fit in the variable. Thus, %len(xx:*MAX).
This is different from %addr(). When I do %addr(xx)+2 today, it's my way of getting the address of the data portion of the VARYING variable. So %addr(xx:*DATA) makes sense to me in that case.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.