Re: Checking indicators

Vernon Hamberg wrote:

Barbara - that is very cool.

I tried the following, and thought it should work

char10 = %subarr(*in : 1 : 10);

but i get the following message

RNF5343 30      5 000500  Array has too many omitted indexes;

The second level text is not helpful - nothing about that message is
helpful, or I at least have no idea what I can do about it. Wait, is
it that i had set only *IN(10) - which i had - so it thinks it is a
sparse array?

The message is trying to tell you that you can't assign an array to a
non-array.  %subarr(*in10 : 1 : 10) returns an array of 10 indicators. 
It's basically the same as trying to do this, which isn't supported.
   char99 = *in;

You can't compare arrays at all, even one array compared to another.  So
you can't use %subarr in a comparison.