× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Peter,

That makes sense.  I was still viewing it from the perspective of not
using variable length fields which is where I started with this.  The
variable lengths was the last attempt to resolve the situation.

I created a command to use instead of calling the program directly and
it seems to be working fine.  Still a couple more tests to go.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Levy
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:17 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: Parameters passed not what is received

It actually isn't being combined. It just looks that way.
Parameters are like variables based on pointers. The dump
program probably mistook the varying size as 50135, so it was
trying to print out everything in the field. Your string is
actually 32 bytes, but it cut off the first two so that
reduces it to 30. In addition the CALL command allocates
storage for the parameters and they're usually right next to
each other (with a space or two in between). So your
parameter says it's "40 bytes varying", the size says it's
50135 and there's only 30 bytes of data in the field, so when
the dump program outputs the data in storage it looks like
it's simply outputting 40 bytes of storage from the starting
point of that parameter, which overruns into the next
parameter's data.

Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Peter,

I think I understand what you're saying, that's why I included the
message written to the job log.  The parms look like they are being
passed correctly so why are the values being combined?  It
looks to me
like a parameter mismatch but if it is I'm not seeing it.  Maybe
something isn't honoring the end of parameter marker?


Privileged and Confidential.  This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is 
intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain 
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this e-mail.  
You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.