|
All good points Alan but I would tend to agree with Joe, mainly because the stuff any new person is likely to be working on will include "old style" code, and while it is good to be able to service the latest Ferrari, most mechanics will still need to be able to look after the older Rover Metro's too. :-) IMHO Steve -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]Namens Alan Campin Verzonden: woensdag 20 september 2006 18:34 Aan: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Onderwerp: RE: Simple Display file problem <snip> Actually, I'd suggest learning the appropriate places to use the different database tools that the iSeries gives you. SQL is appropriate for set-based logic, typically queries, while single record fetches and especially record-at-a-time updates are much better written using native I/O. </snip> I might agree with you Joe except for one thing and that is database independence. Because IBM does not give us an easy way to bring in just what we need from a table, SQL is a better solution for just about anything because I can. <snip>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.