|
Interesting concept for PRs. I still like /includes for DSs, constants, etc. I am not a big fan of creating a dummy file just to use as an external DS definition. Your concept for PR's would be much like (but different) using command definitions, right? Direct support for command definitions in RPG sure would be nice. system(), qcmdexc(), etc don't cut it because of return variables, etc. Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.