|
The second level text on compiler message RNF7705 says: Cause . . . . . : The second parameter for %KDS must be a numeric value with zero decimal positions known at compile-time. In addition, the value must not be greater than the number of subfields in the data structure specified as the first parameter for %KDS. The operation is ignored. Recovery . . . : Omit the second parameter for %KDS, or specify a valid numeric value that is known at compile-time. Compile again.The key words are "numeric value with zero decimal positions known at compiled time." I think this means a literal or named constant with no decimal positions, not a variable.
I agree that the manual should be more specific about what is expected in %KDS factor 2. Mel Rothman Andy Hautamaki wrote:
I'm trying to do a chain using a %kds qualifying the key fields to use with a numeric variable but am getting compile errors.D g_keyfields s 1 0 g_KeyFields = 2; chain %kds(ky_fb : g_KeyFields) fhrec; The compile errors on the chain I'm getting are;RNF7071 30 1 Number of KFLDs in KLIST is greater than number of key field in fileRNF7705 30 2 The second parameter for %KDS is not valid.I'm not seeing anything in the manual that would say I can't use a variable for the number of keys to use for %KDS. Or is this one of these things that you just can't use a variable for. I'm at V5R3.Thanks; Andy
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.