|
To the best of my knowledge you cannot define an indicator constant. And I cannot think of any reason why you would want to define one. There are only two that you could define and they are supplied by the figurative constants *On and *Off. In your example, why can't you just return *Off? Regards Paul Tuohy ComCon www.comconadvisor.com -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lim Hock-Chai Sent: 05 May 2006 18:00 To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: Compile failed when try to do return not SUCCESSFUL where SUCCESSFULis declared as const D SUCCESSFUL c const(*on) D proc1 pr n C eval *inlr = *on *------------------------------------------------------ * test return with not SUCCESSFUL P proc1 B D pi n C return not SUCCESSFUL P proc1 E I'm getting this: Msg id Sv Number Seq Message text RNF7421 30 12 001200 Operands are not compatible with the type of operator. If I changed SUCCESSFUL to be a variable, it compile ok. Any reason why I can't do "return not constBoolean"?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.