|
That is correct. You would be able to get the same result as left outer join, union and exception join suggested in this thread.. "rick baird" <rick.baird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:e3018b9e0604170943m19fd65bew75984b5e043d517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > after thinking about it, would that be a join that includes records in > both files, regardless of matches in the other? > > for instance: > > - - | 1 2 > - - | 1 3 > 2 1 | 2 1 > 2 2 | - - > 3 1 | 3 1 > - - | 4 1 > > On 4/17/06, rick baird <rick.baird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > what's a full inner join? > > > > I'm trying to think of what other sort of join you'd need other than > > inner, left outer and exception. > > > > On 4/17/06, Wes <destaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I wonder when IBM will support FULL INNER JOIN...that would make life so > > > much easier > > > > -- > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
