|
Bill, > C EXSR DETAIL > > CLR EXSR TOTAL > > /free > > Unless I'm missing something isn't this the same as my example except the > different subroutine name? No, it is different. Barbara inserted two (fixed form) lines ahead of the free form. The first becomes the entire "mainline" of the detail time calcs, and simply calls a subroutine DETAIL which contains all the detail time processing. The second line is the "total time" calcs and calls subroutine TOTAL. The difference here is that in Barbara's case, the TOTAL subroutine is actually called during total time of the cycle, whereas your example called it at the end of the detail time in the cycle. The difference can be important when using primary or secondary files but may be academic if only using full-procedural file processing. As an aside, I think Barbara's example should use either L1 or even L0 in columns 7-8 instead of LR so that it is called every cycle. That way if additional Lx calcs are needed in the future they can be added inside TOTAL with tests similar to her test for *inLR. As coded, if other *INLx calcs were added to TOTAL, they would only get processed at LR time. Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.