|
RPGLE is not "definitely much faster" than SQL. RPGLE is faster when working one record at a time. Once you start working with multiple records, then SQL moves ahead. HTH, Charles Wilt -- iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America ph: 513-573-4343 fax: 513-398-1121 > -----Original Message----- > From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Troxclaire > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:57 PM > To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: SQL Update in RPGLE. > > All the inputs are correct and I agree that there is no need > for SQL if only > one file is involved but I already have a ready made > complicated SQL query > so I wanted to go the SQL way. I agree that F specs were not > needed at all. > The update query ran just fine when I added "WITH NC" at the > end of the SQL > statement. > > It would be very interesting to see some input on > performance when it > comes to SQL compared to RPGLE. RPGLE would definitely be > much faster but > just wondering by how much. I have atleast 12 files in my > UPDATE statement. > > Cheers, > > Mike. > > _________________________________________________________________
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.