|
Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I'm beginning to question whether this really is a good idea. Due to > deadlines I coded around the issue by moving the database fields into > the DS fields prior to the call. The CONST solution sounds like it > might work better. I'll have to try it when I get the chance. > Rick, using CONST is indeed a very good idea. But I think it would still be useful for you to see how defining the externally-described DS in your main source file would also fix up the problem.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.