|
Douglas, As long as you don't do things that try to build access paths dynamically (such as SQL or OPNQRYF) and you stick to keyed access in RPG, you should be fine. I would think that breaking this down into smaller units would only increase the hassles of managing these file objects, especially if they'll all be joined into a common access path anyway.... If you need to access this monster file via SQL, it's important to ensure that you have the correct indexes already built. Performance tuning in SQL is sometimes a bit like sorcery or alchemy... You might see what you want today, but tomorrow it won't work the same.... Eric DeLong Sally Beauty Company MIS-Project Manager (BSG) 940-297-2863 or ext. 1863 -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Douglas W. Palme Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 8:08 AM To: RPG Group Subject: Chaining with a very large file we may be faced with having to allow an interactive program to do a chain to a very large file; one with approximately 1.1 billion records and a file size of approximately 9.7gb of disk space. Are there any performance issues that I should take into consideration? Should I consider breaking the data down into multiple files? The file will have a total of three numeric fields, all packed, 5 digits for the first two and 4 digits for the third. Suggestions, thoughts, helpful hints.....would all be appreciated. If you bought it, it was hauled by a truck - somewhere, sometime.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.