× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. November 2005

RE: To ride The Cycle or not to ride (was Re: INZSR ....)

 >> Absolutely - I'm still waiting for PL/I modules...

I hope you are not holding your breath!  Ain't no way that's going to
happen.

And Don - I know it wasn't you but I'm suspicious that you may have an
alias! <grin>

There were so few licenses sold of PL/I (and almost none to companies that
weren't software vendors) - even if it was a better subset IBM would only
have sold another half dozen copies or so.  There is no way that the porting
expense could be justified.  I suspect the mainframe version written in PL/X
and not even in the W-code family.  Either of those factors would
substantially increase the port cost.

Jon Paris
Partner400

www.Partner400.com
www.RPGWorld.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.