RE: *varsize array as procedure parameter

Oh yes, always when I hit the "send" button I realize that I forgot
something!

The reason I introduced the pointers was that my arrays are not that
small as the simple 5 character field I used for the example.
The real arrays consists of large datastructures, and I did not want to
waste space with 32767 dimensions of them in the procedure. But, maybe I
might have been thinking wrong. Does the compiler reserve space for a
const parameter? 

TIA, Arco Simonse 

> 
> Scott, 
> 
> I must have been completely blind... 
> To be honest, I even can't remember anymore why I introduced 
> the pointer (un)logic in my procedures.
> I really messed it up in my brain, made to much hours this 
> week I think.
> 
> Thanks for helping me out!
> Regards, Arco.
> 
 
DISCLAIMER:
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is 
the property of the sender. 
It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are not 
authorized to read, print, retain, copy,disseminate, distribute, or use this 
message or any part thereof. If you
receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
all copies of this message. 

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept of the 
presence of computer viruses