|
>>What performance considerations with Const? Look at the following article by Scott Klement (Free registration is required) Why Combine CONST, VARYING, and OPTIONS(*VARSIZE)? http://www.iseriesnetwork.com/artarchive/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewNewsletter Article&webID=1001&newsID=5012&issueID=5325&articleID=51273 Birgitta -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Kurt Anderson Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juli 2005 22:54 An: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Betreff: RE: No Subroutines (was Re: Debugging many subprocedures) > The reason I say other than the prototype is because there are performance > considerations when using VALUE and CONST. (Trying to catch up on all the procedure-related emails...) What performance considerations with Const? Thanks, Kurt Anderson Application Developer Highsmith Inc -- This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
