|
> From: Paul Morgan > > A subprocedure has no business controlling the flow of anything that calls > it. I mildly disagree. I believe there are two kinds of errors: expected and unexpected. Expected errors are recoverable conditions that a calling procedure might be able to rectify. Unexpected errors signal horrible fatal conditions (like a master file not found) and cannot be recovered from. Adding code to test for these conditions is unnecessary and counter-productive. Instead, I register a "top level" entry point. This is where any unexpected errors should go. When an error occurs, I simply send an exception message to that level. It automatically cleans up the stack and allows me to notify the operator of the condition. This is really useful in situations where the procedure wouldn't normally return an error. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.