|
Like this: D FOOBARCDTA S 100A DIM(132) PERRCD(1) CTDATA D P_FOOBAR S * INZ( %ADDR(FOOBARDS) D FOOBARDS DS BASED( P_FOOBAR ) D FOOBAR 200A DIM( 66 ) D FOO 5S 0 OVERLAY( FOOBARDTA2 ) D BAR 97A OVERLAY(FOOBARDTA2:*NEXT)Does this look okay? You already realize you can go For idx =1 to 66 etc. but that's more convoluted yet methinks.
It's been awhile, but this wouldn't lose any cross-or implicit functionality from the ALT() keyword, would it?
--- Alan ======================== James H H Lampert wrote:
Anybody know if it's possible to define a compile-time array (or in my case, an alternating pair of compile-time arrays) so that the total length of an element (or element pair) is over 100 bytes, so long as the initializers in the CTDATA block are under 100 bytes?On a more concrete level, suppose you have D FOO S 5S 0 DIM(66) PERRCD(1) CTDATA D BAR S 97A DIM(66) ALT(FOO)which would produce a combined length of 102 bytes. Anybody know whether the compiler would accept that, so long as it's never necessary to initialize more than the first 95 bytes of BAR?-- JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
