|
James, What's your point? You'd be more appt to use ILE RPG IV techniques if the called it something besides RPG? I agree that ILE RPG IV is different enough from RPG that IBM could have given it a completely new name. In fact, that might of been quite beneficial. Instead of people hearing "RPG Developer" and thinking "green screen, monolithic, costly to modify applications". They could hear, oh how about "Lightning Developer" so they think "high speed, easily maintained, modular applications, with your choice of UI." Yeah, that would be sweet. Instead, IBM chose to emphasize the similarities and the ease of migration between RPG III and RPG IV. I assume, one reason for this emphasis was to convince people to migrate. Doesn't seem to have worked very well. To bad they didn't just rename it. But hindsight is 20/20 as they say. Charles Wilt -- iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America ph: 513-573-4343 fax: 513-398-1121 > -----Original Message----- > From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of James H H Lampert > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:00 AM > To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries > Subject: Re: Resistance to change (was free format question) > > > In my case, it's not "resistance to change"; if it were > that, then why am I fluent, to varying degrees, in 3 > assemblers and over a dozen HLLs, in multiple dialetcs? > > What I DO resist, and resist vigorously, is the practice > of evolving a langauge to where it has lost all the > defining characteristics of the one it evolved from, but > continuing to call it what it no longer is. For example, > BASIC is a language, evolved from FORTRAN, that requires > line numbers, uses them as statement labels, and has no > local variables or external calls. The QBASICs TBASICS, > and so forth, evolved from BASIC, but are NOT themselves > BASIC, having lost every characteristic that defines > BASIC, and I refuse to call them BASIC. They are > DERIVATIVES of BASIC, not DIALECTS. > > Likewise, RPG has a highly stylized syntax based on column > positions, and it also has excellent file I/O, and an > implicit "DO UNTIL LR IS TRUE" loop surrounding every > program. If you don't bother learning how to use The > Cycle, though, then there's little reason for you to be > using RPG at all, and if you take away the > column-position-based syntax, you may end up with a great > language, but it has ceased to be RPG. > > -- > JHHL > -- > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) > mailing list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.