|
Which means: free format is outdated, too. I live in the twenty-first century. And how are you going to solve the problem of maintenance of that "old code"? Personally, I don't mind fixed format: I think it is the beaty of the language, as other languages has theirs. My opinion. Regards, Carel Teijgeler. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 7-6-05 at 10:14 Alan Campin wrote: >If IBM wants to make it less complex, give us a new version without all the >old garbage (Fixed Format, etc). A simple clean consistent >language for the >twentieth century.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.