|
My primary goal for RPG IV is to make it simple/easy to use, not more complex. Granted it should have many new features and I applaud IBMs support for the language! In fact, I am beginning to think about ways that the /FREE syntax can benefit programming over the hybrid extended Factor 2 syntax. Adding new features that invite complexity by the fact that they are strangely inconsistent with existing language elements is, to me, adding complexity. One problem I'm having is teaching RPG IV to RPGIII programmers as well as new programmers; helping customers justify the move to RPG IV is becoming more difficult since RPG IV itself is becoming so complicated and inconsistent. If what they are adding to the language is good syntax then why are they changing the syntax for new features on each release? Also, Z-SUB and Z-ADD are not part of the /FREE movement so I don't see them as justification for EVAL-CORR. In fact the contemporary On-Error opcode is the only opcode where I continue to receive questions as to "why the hell is there a hyphen in the middle of that one?" It is not that a hyphen is a bad idea, it is not, it is that it introduces another inconsistent element into RPG IV. People are used to no hyphens and when someone sees one and asks "what's that?" it reduces the very productivity that the new feature(s) hope to improve. -Bob Cozzi www.RPGxTools.com If everything is under control, you are going too slow. - Mario Andretti
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.