Re: Free Format TESTN?

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

It depends.

If you are expecting LOTS of errors then use a function to test the field 
for numerics.
If you are expecting few errors, then using MONITOR will outperform your 
function.

In other words,
The MONITOR condition will only kick off if there is a problem, however, 
if you use a function instead, your function will have to be executed 
every time.  Understand?

Rob Berendt
-- 
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





"Paul Morgan" <pmorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
04/05/2005 01:56 PM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Free Format TESTN?






A question just came up at our shop about the free format replacement for
TESTN.  Should we code a function to replace this opcode?  Is there some
comparable API?  Should we just monitor for a RPG error when using the
field?  What is your solution and what is IBM's recommended solution?

Paul

-- 
Paul Morgan
Senior Programmer Analyst - Retail
J. Jill Group
100 Birch Pond Drive, PO Box 2009
Tilton, NH 03276-2009
Phone: (603) 266-2117
Fax:   (603) 266-2333



-- 
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.